Scientist and science communicator @DNLee5 declined an offer to blog for free from biology-online.org and got called a ‘whore’. @DNLee5 posted a thoughtful response on her Scientific American‘s blog ’The Urban Scientist‘. A short time later, her response vanished…
Re blog inquiry: @sciam is a publication for discovering science. The post was not appropriate for this area & was therefore removed.
— Mariette DiChristina (@mdichristina) October 12, 2013
In the words of the wise woman Judge Judy…
I was born at night – 5:05pm to be precise – but it wasn’t LAST night. Unlike @sciam admin, I actually read a number of @sciamblogs. It may shock @sciam admin, but a number of your bloggers aren’t writing all about the wonders of “discovering science”. In a post titled ‘This is not a post about discovering science“, Kate Clancy lists the FIVE posts she’s written that aren’t sciency. Christie Wilcox also pointed to her own non-sciency stuff. Janet Stemwedel is also dubious of @sciam‘s position. These are
two three @sciam bloggers taking @sciam to task over their… shall we say… inconsistent policy (update: read comment #3 at this Christie Wilcox post).
Yes, it IS shocking. Here’s what it tells me….
I’m done with @sciam.
________Judge Judy book image from here Cookie Monster image from here Eartha Kitt image from here Real Housewives image from here Double take image from here Big Bang Theory image from here