Bigot X Defender Bingo™

Bigot Bingo final

Thanks to everybody who contributed, especially @Ichnologist who called for a bingo card!

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

Mathematics of science acumen and douchiness

We seem to tolerate a lot of bullshit behavior from Great Minds. This got me thinking…

What is the mathematical relationship between

science acumen and douchiness? 

My analysis of the data has revealed the following…

science vs douchiness

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off

BMJ’s seasonal shenanigans

BMJ, which insists on pulling a KFC, has been in operation for a long damn time. This journal focuses on health and medical things – SERIOUS STUFF. Every month, SERIOUS STUFF. January, Febuary, March, April, May, June – you get the idea. SERIOUS STUFF, month-after-month… except… wait for it… BMJ’s Christmas issue.

source: Buzzfeed

BMJ is kinda known for its seasonal shenanigans. Last December, Smithsonian Magazine cataloged The Best of the British Medical Journal’s Goofy Christmas Papers. In December 2012, The New York Times talked about how this Journal Offers Dose of Fun for Holiday. The Wikipedia page for BMJ even mentions this tomfoolery under the section ‘Journal Content’.  BMJ has been doing this for a bit over 30 years.  That doesn’t stop folks from taking BMJ’s “goofy Christmas papers” a little too seriously.  This year is no exception.

BMJ Xmas

This one is just made for righteous indignation.

This BMJ article is all over the damn place. NPR,The Washington PostLA Times, Daily Mail, and Buzzfeed – just to name a few. The Washington Post and Buzzfeed articles provided the following heads-up:

Every year, the British Medical Journal puts out an especially, shall we say, whimsical edition in honor of the holiday season. All of the studies therein are subject to the same standards as usual, but they tend to be a bit goofier than the prestigious journal’s usual fare. [The Washington Post]

It’s worth remembering that the BMJ’s Christmas issue is well-known for featuring a rather eccentric selection of articles. While the studies are all peer-reviewed, just like other papers, the topics are…somewhat unusual. [Buzzfeed]

NPR, Daily Mail, and the LA Times did not include such statements. Could be the article authors assumed their readers knew BMJ always pulls something a bit silly in December. Could be the authors themselves simply didn’t know about BMJ’s seasonal shenanigans. I have no idea. What I do know is that I found out about BMJ being a yuletide prankster the hard-ish way.

Back in 1999, the BMJ article Shaken, not stirred: bioanalytical study of the antioxidant activities of martinis‘ was getting all sorts of buzz.  At the time, BMJ was not on my journal radar and I was ignorant to its December pranks. I got a few paragraphs into this Bond article and was all…

source: Sodahead

I mentioned this article to somebody, along with all my feels.  Luckily, that somebody set me straight before I wrote a letter to BMJ.

source: Pixgood

Exactly.  So, if you see a BMJ article marked “Christmas”, just remember…

source: tumblr

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off

House of Academia

1. Why we do research

source: tumblr

2. Why we bust our asses grading papers

truth

source: OK Magazine

3. Why we don’t offer partial credit

source: Giphy

4. Our pep talk to students after that bad exam/presentation/report

source: OK Magazine

source: OK Magazine

5. Post-grant submission, pre-grant decision

source: OK Magazine

source: OK Magazine

6. Looking at a room full of busted lab junk when college space is at a premium

source: Complex

7. When your student or postdoc makes a boss move

source: Giphy

8. When somebody tries to pull a Armando Córdova at a science conference

9. After learning that there are two faculty/staff meetings this week

source: Vulture

10. After pulling a Reviewer #3

source: Uproxx

11. When office hours are over

source: Tumblr

12. When writing our NSF or NIH biographical sketch

source: tumblr

13. If a student tries to manipulate you into giving them a grade they didn’t earn

source: OK Magazine

source: OK Magazine

14. “But I deserve a better grade!”

source: tumblr

15. When somebody mansplains your area of expertise to you

source: Bustle

source: Bustle

16. Research collaboration, you say?

source: wifflegif

17. The minute you submit grades for the term

source: tumblr

__________

Contribute your own gifs in the comments or tweet to @theJAYFK

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Comments Off

Scientific Publishing Flowchart!

After @ChemBark‘s investigations into A Disturbing Note in a Recent SI File and Some VERY Suspicious TEM Images in Nano Letters, plus the recent “unfortunate remark” left in the main body of a paper, we thought a Scientific Publishing Flowchart was in order!

scientific publishing flowchart

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off

Human Resources would like to clarify something for you

 
Human Resources
Any Company* With Any Damn Sense
Any City, Anywhere

Dear Colleagues,

We have received some questions about appropriate employee gatherings on the premises after an email from an outside vendor describing ’Sex Toy After Work Parties’ was received company-wide on September 23rd.  I am writing to address questions raised by this email, which is archived here.

Many of you asked if the party described in the aforementioned email would be an appropriate team-building exercise.  While this company recognizes the value-added nature of social work team activities, a ‘Sex Toy After Work’ party would be a clear violation this company’s Sexual Harassment Policy (see Section 17 of the Employee Handbook).  While approval for after-work external sales parties has been given in the past, sex toys are not Tupperware. To be clear, no ‘Sex Toys After Work’ – or similar such activities – are permitted on company property at any time. As a ‘Sex Toy After Work’ party violates company policy and is thus prohibited, answers to questions regarding the correct timecard entry codes for such a party and exceptions to the company dress code are superfluous.

We hope you find this helpful. Please review the Employee Handbook prior to our newly scheduled mandatory workshop ‘Keeping Work Professional’ next Wednesday at 2:00pm in conference room B.

Regards,

Any Director of Human Resources from Any Company* With Any Damn Sense

______________

*except, perhaps, sex toy companies

______________

Thanks to @LadyBits for inspiration and for the bit about Tupperware!

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Comments Off

NIST announces new time standard

BOULDER, Colo. — The U.S. Department of Commerce’s National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has announced that a new clock, called NIST-RD, will replace the atomic clock NIST-F2.  While NIST-F2 uses the natural resonance frequency of the cesium atom to define a second, NIST-RD uses the frequency of Richard Dawkins tweeting something asinine.

NIST scientists examine NIST-RD

“Quite frankly, we never thought we’d find something more accurate than NIST-F2,” said NIST scientist Dr. Getta Reele, explaining “NIST-F2 was three times as accurate as NIST-F1, not gaining or losing a second in about 300 million years.” That kind of accuracy seemed impossible to beat.  NIST scientists discovered, however, that the frequency of Dawkins’ asinine tweets were nearly two times as accurate as NIST-F2.

While maintaining the most accurate clock is an important mission of NIST, the decision to replace NIST-F2 with a new timekeeper wasn’t without controversy. ”We just introduced NIST-F2 for the replacement for NIST-FI in April,” says NIST clock committee member Dr. Totes Fakey. “Introducing a new timekeeper only four months later raised some eyebrows.”  Controversy soon died down, says Fakey. ”People want to know what time it actually is. NIST-RD helps them do that.”

___________

Of course this is fake. Image is actually of NIST scientists examining NIST-F2.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Comments Off

A #lionfish gif tale

__________

Gif sources: 
X-files  
Chris Pine & Zachary Quinto 
Honey Boo-Boo
Karen Walker
 
these gifs were tweeted by me last night
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Comments Off

Feynman Excuses Bingo!

This is a special guest post from @AstroKatie and @DrMRFrancis
d

After Ash “The Curious Wavefunction” Jogalekar wrote a mostly-good-before-veering-into-WTF-territory post on Dr. Richard Feynman, a few of us took the time to patiently explain exactly what was so dickish about Dr. Feynman. Our criticism based on documented facts – and Feynman’s own words – irritated the Feynman Fanboys™ so much that they turned out in droves to tell us Exactly How Wrong We Were to talk about The Great Man That Way.

Well…. why should all the Feynman Fanboys™ have the fun?  Using actual comments on our blogs and tweets in our social media streams, we’ve created the Feynman Excuses Bingo Card. Play along with us!

Feynman Bingo

The problem of Richard Feynman

Heroes, human “foibles”, and science outreach

Feynman is not my hero

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Comments Off

Look, I’m just trying to help

So, you’ve realized you’ve got some privilege.  Perhaps you’re male. Or white. Or heterosexual. Or Christian. Or highly educated. Or rich. Maybe you’re even a white male immune to hurt feelings. Whateves. You’ve recognized you’ve got some privilege and you’ve decided to use your powers for good. You’re going to help. That group over there. The one you’re not in, but can totes do a solid. Because you’ve got privilege and a plan.

…and you’ve got a superhero name and costume

This all seems like a wonderful idea. You’re self-aware. You’ve the means to help. You’ve shown up to help and now…

Look, Patrice is just trying to be helpful.

WHAT THE WHAT?! Some (or all) of the folks you’re helping don’t seem sufficiently grateful for your help. They’re questioning your motives, your approach, your helpful plan.  They are not letting you simply show up and fix things.  Perhaps they’ve even said…

pipe down, baby Darth

This is not the reaction you were expecting.  Because you have privilege and a plan. And, because…

of course

Are you really? Did you ask them if they wanted or needed your help? Did you ask how you could best help? Oh, you didn’t ask those last two questions? Then…

seriously

Really, what are you doing? Because it isn’t ‘help‘.

__________

Captain Hammer gif from here
Patrice gif from here
Star Wars gif from here
Doing this for you gif from here
West Wing gif from here
Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off